Optimization of HPP operation modes based on the theory of marginal utility and hydro resource cost estimation
Keywords:
optimization of hydropower plants functioning, marginal utility, water price for hydropower plants, incremental rate characteristic, flexible energy marketAbstract
The purpose of this article is to solve the problem of optimizing the operation of a hydroelectric power station based on the theory of marginal utility and assessing the cost of a hydro resource, taking into account the characteristic modes of operation of a hydroelectric power station. In this work, a universal method, which combines an optimization method and a method for assessing marginal utility. The method developed by the authors involves use the adequate representation of the incremental rate characteristic and the determination of the cost of the hydro resource for the control of the operating modes of the HPP. Using the example of the Novosibirsk HPPs and TPPs, an assessment of the energy efficiency, proposing the concept of a developed methodology for determining the price of water for HPPs, will be obtained. Based on the results of the implementation of the developed approach at Novosibirsk HPPs, the electricity sales price competitive electricity market can be matched with the electricity sales price generated at TPP, which will be approximately 370 ¢/kWh.
Metrics
References
ГОСТ
1. Mitrofanov S.V., Sekretarev Y.A. Preventive control taking into account of an op-erational condition power equipment and flowing path of hydropower plant [Превентивное управление эксплуатационным состоянием основного силового оборудования и проточного тракта ГЭС] // Journal of the Siberian Federal University. 2013. № 1. P. 3-14.
EDN: PXQQZJ
2. Simulation Model of Cascaded Hydro Power Plants in Pamir / A. Rusina, S. Mitrofanov, A. Arestova, N. Terlyga // The 13 International forum on strategic technology (IFOST 2018), Proc. Harbin: IEEE, 2018. P. 889-892. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363103005_ Simulation_Model_of_Cascaded_Hydro_Power_Plants_in_Pamir
3. Макконнелл К.Р., Брю С.Л., Флинн Ш.М. Экономикс: принципы, проблемы и политика: учебник; пер. с англ. 21-е изд. М.: ИНФРА-М, 2023. 1152 с.
4. Гальперин В.М. Теория потребительского поведения и спроса. СПб: Эко-номическая школа, 1993. 380 с.
5. Гидроэнергетика / Т.А. Филиппова, М.Ш. Мисриханов, Ю.М. Сидоркин, А.Г. Ру-сина. Новосибирск: НГТУ, 2011. 640 c.
6. Transmission Grid Resiliency Investment Optimization Model with SOCP Recovery Plan-ning / K. Garifi, E.S. Johnson, B. Arguello, B.J. Pierre // IEEE Transactions on Power Sys-tems. 2022. Vol. 37, Issue 1. P. 26-37.
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3091538
7. Robust optimization-based resilient distribution network planning against natural disas-ters / W. Yuan, J. Wang, F. Qiu et al. // IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid. 2016. Vol. 7, Is-sue 6. P. 2817–2826. DOI: 10.1109/TSG.2015.2513048
8. A scalable mixed-integer decomposition approach for optimal power system restoration [Electronic resource] / I. Aravena, D. Rajan, G. Patsakis et al. // Oak Ridge: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information. 8 p. URL: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1642361 (дата обращения: 15.06.2023).
9. The classification of accidental situations scenarios on hydropower plants / O. Skvort-sova, A. Dashkina, E. Petrovskaia et al. // MATEC Web of Conferences. EDP Science. 2016, Vol. 53. P. 01014.
EDN: VWROZF
DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/20165301014
10. Effects of different deuterium concentrations of the media on the bacterial growth and mutagenesis / G. Török, M. Csík, A. Pintér, A. Surján // Egészségtudomány. 2000. Vol. 4. P. 331-338.
11. Technologies for reducing sludge production in wastewater treatment plants: state of the art / Q. Wang, W. Wei, Y. Gong et al. // Science of the Total Environment. 2017. Vol. 587-588. P. 510-521.
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.203
12. What Advanced Treatments Can Be Used to Minimize the Production of Sewage Sludge in WWTPs? / M.C. Collivignarelli, A. Abbà, M.C. Miino, V. Torretta // Applied Sciences. 2019. Vol. 9, Issue 13. P. 2650.
DOI: 10.3390/app9132650
13. Ivanova E.V., Balobanova A.G. Assessment of opportunity of placement the re-newable energy sources on the territory of the Novosibirsk HPP // Aspire to Science: материалы междунар. науч. конф. студентов, магистрантов и аспирантов, Новосибирск, 18 апр. 2019 г. Новосибирск: Изд-во НГТУ, 2019. С. 87–91.
EDN: KWLBII
14. Разработка имитационной модели работы каскада ГЭС/ С.В. Митрофанов, А.Ю. Арестова, А.Г. Русина, А.Е. Калинин // Вестник Казанского государственного энер-гетического университета. 2019. Т. 11, № 2 (42). С. 116–126.
EDN: ZFACHZ
15. Mitrofanov S.V., Sekretarev Y.A. Decision support system for hydro unit com-mitment // 2 International conference on industrial engineering, applications and manufacturing (ICIEAM). Proc. Chelyabinsk: IEEE, 2016. P. 1-4.
EDN: XNFIWB
DOI: 10.1109/ICIEAM.2016.7911424
16. Behavioral simulation and optimization of generation companies in electricity markets by fuzzy cognitive map / S.F. Ghaderi, A. Azadeh, B.P. Nokhandan, E. Fathi // Expert Systems with Applications. 2012. Vol. 39. P. 4635–4646.
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.097
17. Гальперин В.М., Игнатьев С.М., Моргунов В.И. Микроэкономика. СПб: Эко-номическая школа. 1997. 348 с.
18. Sekretarev Y.A., Myateg T.V., Gorshin A.V. Justification of the water price at hy-dropower plants based on its operational features according to the maximization profit criteria // International multi-conference on industrial engineering and modern technologies (FarEastCon). Proc. Vladivostok: IEEE, 2020, P. 1-6.
EDN: OMEULL
DOI: 10.1109/FarEastCon50210.2020.9271220
19. Sekretarev Y.A., Chekalina T.V., Malosemov B.V. Administration Functioning Power Generation Companies by Criterion of Maximization Profit // Symposium of papers the 6th International Forum on Strategic Technology (IFOST-2011). Harbin: IEEE, 2011. P. 491-494.
EDN: PEBSND
DOI: 10.1109/IFOST.2011.6021070
APA
1. Mitrofanov, S. V., & Sekretarev, Y. A. (2013). Preventive control taking into account of an operational condition power equipment and flowing path of hydropower plant. Journal of the Siberian Federal University, 1, 3-14.
2. Rusina, A., Mitrofanov, S,. Arestova, A., & Terlyga N. (2018). Simulation model of cascaded HPPs in Pamir. In Proc The 13 International forum on strategic technology (IFOST 2018) . (pp. 889-892). IEEE. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363103005_Simulation_Model_of_Cascaded_ Hydro_Power_Plants_in_Pamir
3. McConnell, С., Brue, S., & Flynn, S. (2023). Economics: principles, problems and politics (21th ed.). McGraw Hill.
4. Gal'perin V. M. (1993). Teoriya potrebitel'skogo povedeniya i sprosa [Theory of con-sumer behavior and demand]. Ekonomicheskaya shkola. [In Russian]
5. Filippova, T. A., Misrihanov, M. Sh., Sidorkin, Yu. M., & Rusina, A. G. (2011). Gidroenergetika [Hydropower] . Izd-vo NGTU. [In Russian]
6. Garifi, K., Johnson, E. S., Arguello, B., & Pierre B. J. (2022). Transmission Grid Resiliency In-vestment Optimization Model with SOCP Recovery Planning. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 37, 26-37. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3091538
7. Yuan, W., Wang, J., Qiu, F., Chen, C., Kang, C., & Zeng, B. (2016). Robust optimization-based resilient distribution network planning against natural disasters. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 7(6) , 2817-2826. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2015.2513048
8. Aravena, I., Rajan, D., Patsakis, G., Oren, S. S., & Rios, J. (2019). A scalable mixed-integer decomposition approach for optimal power system restoration. Retrieved June 20, 2023, from https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1642361.
9. Skvortsova, O., Dashkina, A., Petrovskaia, E., Terleev, V., Nikonorov, A., Badenko, V., Volkova, Y., & Pavlov, S. (2016). The classification of accidental situations scenarios on hydro-power plants. MATEC Web of Conferences, 53, 01014. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20165301014
10. Török, G., Csík, M., Pintér, A., & Surján, A. (2000). Effects of different deuterium concen-trations of the media on the bacterial growth and mutagenesis. Egészségtudomány, 44, 331-338.
11. Wang, Q., Wei, W., Gong, Y., Yu, Q., Li, Q., Sun, J., & Yuan, Z. (2017). Technologies for reduc-ing sludge production in wastewater treatment plants: state of the art. Science of the Total Environment. 587-588, 510-521. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.203
12. Collivignarelli, M. C., Abbà, A., Miino, M. C., & Torretta, V. (2019). What Advanced Treat-ments Can Be Used to Minimize the Production of Sewage Sludge in WWTPs?. Applied Scienc-es, 9(13) , 2650. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app9132650
13. Ivanova, E. V. (2019). Assessment of opportunity of placement the renewable energy sources on the territory of the Novosibirsk HPP. In Proc Aspire to Science (pp.87-91). NSTU.
14. Mitrofanov, S. V., Arestova, A. Y., Rusina, A. G., & Kalinin, A. E. (2019). Razrabotka imi-tacionnoj modeli raboty kaskada GES [Development of a simulation model for the operation of a HPP cascade]. Vestnik Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo energeticheskogo universiteta, 11(2) , 116–126. [In Russian]
15. Mitrofanov, S. V., & Sekretarev, Y. A. (2016). Decision support system for hydro unit commitment. In Proc 2 International conference on industrial engineering, applications and manufacturing (ICIEAM) . (pp. 1-4). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIEAM.2016.7911424
16. Ghaderi, S. F., Azadeh, A., Nokhandan, B. P., & Fathi, E. (2012). Behavioral simulation and optimization of generation companies in electricity markets by fuzzy cognitive map. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 4635–4646. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.097
17. Gal'perin, V. M., Ignat'ev, S. M., & Morgunov, V. I. (1997). Mikroekonomika [Microeco-nomics] . Ekonomicheskaya shkola. [In Russian]
18. Sekretarev, Y. A., Myateg, T. V., & Gorshin, A. V. (2020). Justification of the water price at hydropower plants based on its operational features according to the maximization profit crite-ria. In Proc International multi-conference on industrial engineering and modern technolo-gies (FarEastCon) . (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FarEastCon50210.2020.9271220
19. Sekretarev, Y. A., Chekalina, T. V., Malosemov, B. V. (2011). Administration Functioning Power Generation Companies by Criterion of Maximization Profit. In Proc Symposium of pa-pers the 6th International Forum on Strategic Technology (IFOST-2011) . (Vol. 1, pp. 491-494). Harbin University of Science and Technology. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IFOST.2011.6021070
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
URN
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Yu.A. Sekretarev, T.V. Myateg , S.V. Bezmenov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
